Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:22 pmI agree, it looks very nice now!
Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:22 pmPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:12 am[quote="J'anim Paedet"] Beautiful! Now, if we could only get the cloudy foreground to rotate...
Technically it's possible, but it'd be better first that we agree on the environment. I put this sky as a temporary thing, now I'm glad you like it
but the debate about the exact environment is still open IMHO.Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:30 amI think that the eternal dusk-ish brown-ish look is good, as long as we can get some cloud movement.
like someone said before, we could have 3 layers: a stationary sky bubble on the top, then a partially transparent parially 60% opaque cloud layer, then a partially transparent partially 40% opaque layer lowest down. the sky wouldnt move, but the two cloud layers would rotate at different speeds.
like someone said before, we could have 3 layers: a stationary sky bubble on the top, then a partially transparent parially 60% opaque cloud layer, then a partially transparent partially 40% opaque layer lowest down. the sky wouldnt move, but the two cloud layers would rotate at different speeds.
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:32 amYes, I like it and all but to me it looks a bit too "mechanical" i dunno thats just my opinion!
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:15 amTime for another one word post 
plLayerAnimation
*We're looking into it*
plLayerAnimation
*We're looking into it*
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:21 amplLayerAnimationBase
hsKeyedObject > plSynchedObject > plLayerInterface > plLayerAnimationBase > plLayerAnimation