Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:04 pmWhilyam wrote:But if he has something substantial to add to the discussion and he's not interested enough to sign up, I will post it.
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:56 amPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:10 amPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:29 amChacal wrote:Whilyam wrote:But if he has something substantial to add to the discussion and he's not interested enough to sign up, I will post it.
Er, now THAT sounds strange.
If someone isn't interested, then he isn't interested.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:30 pmNot really, no. You either haven't been around enough people to have seen it, or you haven't experienced it yourself. Interest is not black and white.
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:00 am
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:52 amJWPlatt wrote:Hi Whilyam,
My first PM was to the participants of the thread. I never expected nor asked anyone to post it. You did, which is okay, but I didn't ask. Personally, I would clear a PM with the author before posting it, but I can understand how you would interpret my PM to multiple recipients as implicit permission. However, I included you on the remaining PMs knowing you might post them too, but only because I could see I needed to clarify after the first PM was posted.
Because there seems to be a requirement of participation of some sort within the organization if you are a Representative, and because I take commitments seriously and do not have the time, I will not be requesting inclusion in the Representative Usergroup.
You can post this if you wish. I will not ask to impose further on the private matters of the GoW. I hope you folks get on with the topic.
JW