dendwaler wrote:Hmm, i thought it was only the color depth , not the detail like in your text example
Color depth (the number of bits per pixel) is constant in JPEG compression. Image detail is a function of the color values, which become increasingly trashed (as in my example). It's not such a big deal if you're looking at the entire texture, but as you approach the object, it starts looking nasty.
dendwaler wrote:If i use only png or tga , wont it result in a bigger prp file , because the source is bigger?
No. PyPRP internally decompresses all images to bitmaps and recompresses them one by one. The size of bitmaps is a function of its dimensions (specifically, width x height x 4). If you decompress a 0% jpeg and a PNG to a bitmap, they will have the same file size. The latter will look infinitely better than the former, however.
dendwaler wrote: used a small jpg because the PyPrp was not able to export the age because of memory issues .
This sounds like you're using way too much geometry in your ages. The plugin isn't the most memory efficient (or fast) thing in the world, but it really shouldn't need more than 32-bits of address space.
matthornb wrote:ImportError: The _imaging C module is not installed
So PIL wasn't installed correctly

You should uninstall it and make sure you've installed the latest version. It's not good to mix-and-match components.