Goofy wrote:Also take everything the recruiter says with a grain of salt and get everything in writing

if possible
The above quote can not be heeded enough. They are worst than any used car dealers trying to sell you the car the little old lady only drove to church on Sundays.
I am not sure how it is today. During the Viet-Nam era for some comparison.
Check out each branch of military to see what is being offered. If you have a skill set that is in demand you might be able to do some picking & choosing instead of be told what you will do.
All the below came with a total of 6 year commitment. X years active and the rest in-active reserves. They are calling up in-active reserves these days.
2 years active enlist – you’re going into combat.
3 years active enlist - ? I don’t remember
4 years active enlist – higher level of training depending on test scores & you’re going into a combat zone. Score high enough and get offered OCS (Officer Candidate School) and become an officer but now you have to do 6 active years.
6 years active minimum for officer – crap shoot of what you do.
Be thankful there is no draft. Draftees had very little to no choice. 2 years and into combat.
I enlisted USMC for 4 years. RVN '69 & '70