According to RAWA, pellets do... something.

Anything that isn't directly related to Age Creation but that might be interesting to Age developers.

According to RAWA, pellets do... something.

Postby D'nial » Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:09 pm

http://mystonline.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=361843#361843

Noticeable changes in lake light can be seen from "certain vantage points"?

What do you think? Is doing pellet runs more interesting in the slightest? Or is this old news?
If I had a signature, this is where it would be...
User avatar
D'nial
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:45 pm
Location: In a world where all men are guilty until proven dead!

Re: According to RAWA, pellets do... something.

Postby N. Sigismund » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:07 am

Well RAWA's been saying they do do something for a while, but now he's actually given a good answer that satisfies most questions. He checks the figure daily and updates an algorithm that determines how much progress has been made towards a healthier lake. Due to the whole No-DRC thing in Cavern, the updates by DRC staff are not happening.

It's heartening for those who have spent a great deal of time baking pellets, I suppose.
For reference:
IC: Nye Morgan
OOC: Sigismund, Nye, Huw Dawson
N. Sigismund
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:39 am

Re: According to RAWA, pellets do... something.

Postby Kemy » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:48 am

The texture of the far lake edge is slightly brighter, someone found the two images on the Moul forum, but thats all, it took 85,000,000 pellets at what OHB calculated to be 30 years in manhours to do that. So don't hold your breath.
MO:ULa #00365471
Age Concept Designer / Storyline developer
User avatar
Kemy
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:13 pm
Location: UK

Re: According to RAWA, pellets do... something.

Postby JWPlatt » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:36 am

Kemy wrote:...it took 85,000,000 pellets...

The point of RAWA's post to address this kind of persistent misinformation seems to have been lost on you. If this kind of logic about total "calories" given to the lake applied to real life, Earth would be a fireball - no, a burned out cinder - in space because of the 4.5 billion years of full-spectrum pummeling it has received from the Sun. And you would be a bloated 10,000-pound human being from all the food you've eaten over your lifetime. :P

Also, you folks don't even seem to have considered that the current "total" you've found includes only MOULa. You're a bit short. :shock:
OpenUru.org: An Uru project resource site.
Perfect speed is being there.
User avatar
JWPlatt
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:13 pm
Location: Everywhere, all at once

Re: According to RAWA, pellets do... something.

Postby OHB » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:51 am

JWPlatt wrote:Also, you folks don't even seem to have considered that the current "total" you've found includes only MOULa. You're a bit short. :shock:



Actually we have. But you weren't in that discussion.
User avatar
OHB
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:50 am

Re: According to RAWA, pellets do... something.

Postby Pavitra » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:37 am

JWPlatt wrote:The point of RAWA's post to address this kind of persistent misinformation seems to have been lost on you. If this kind of logic about total "calories" given to the lake applied to real life, Earth would be a fireball - no, a burned out cinder - in space because of the 4.5 billion years of full-spectrum pummeling it has received from the Sun. And you would be a bloated 10,000-pound human being from all the food you've eaten over your lifetime. :P

It's a question of game design, not ecology. Why is it a good idea to require that much effort for that little payoff?

JWPlatt wrote:Also, you folks don't even seem to have considered that the current "total" you've found includes only MOULa. You're a bit short. :shock:

And this is supposed to be a good thing?
Have Ages, and link to them without bindings. [Words 1:13]
Seltani
User avatar
Pavitra
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 7:11 pm

Re: According to RAWA, pellets do... something.

Postby Jojon » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:47 am

Now, if somebody is suggesting that the only thing we add to the lake is calories, we have one heek of a problem. That would mean that we'd need ever increasing constant supplies to feed a growing population and to remove waste.

I would hope that it is a self sustaining, more or less closed eco system, that is slowly recuperating, here.
Jojon
 
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:49 am


Return to Off-Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests