IC site

Discuss issues with role playing age creation. What are some sticky points that must be overcome? How will certain processes translate to RP?

Re: IC site

Postby Aloys » Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:31 am

Choosing what to display on this list is indeed a bit delicate. If we want to be fair we should list all Ages, but the UAM list already does that. And many (the majority?) of the released Ages are essentially abandonned or were merely test works.. I agree listing only 'recent and active' Ages is a good start as we can set specific metrics for those, to avoid subjective selections.

Also, wouldn't it be better if the Ages descriptions were not filled by us (as in 'the people doing the site') but rather either by the authors themselves, or by one of the oter Guilds (Archivists and/or Maintainters) ? It would make for a nice collective work and a good occasion to foster Guild interactions...
User avatar
Aloys
 
Posts: 1968
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: France (GMT +1)

Re: IC site

Postby Trylon » Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:46 am

Aloys wrote:Also, wouldn't it be better if the Ages descriptions were not filled by us (as in 'the people doing the site') but rather either by the authors themselves, or by one of the oter Guilds (Archivists and/or Maintainters) ? It would make for a nice collective work and a good occasion to foster Guild interactions...


I basically agree, though I would phrase "not filled by us" as "not JUST filled by us".
In my experience it's often a good idea to make a start writing something, and then let the people who should have written it fix your mistakes.

At least we should make a start filling it in, just to give the others an idea what it is that should be filled in. Ofcourse, it would be best if we did that by filling in info on our own ages first
One day I ran through the cleft for the fiftieth time, and found that uru held no peace for me anymore.
User avatar
Trylon
 
Posts: 1446
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:08 pm
Location: Gone from Uru

Re: IC site

Postby diafero » Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:21 pm

Using the Alcugs data, you could easily just use some of the ages, not all. And if the information there is not sufficient, why not extend it, so that there is one set of good information (perhaps available through two sites) instead of two incomplete/minimalistic sets?

I mean, if you want to do it yet again, I won't be able to stop you anyway, but I don't get the point.
I prefer e-mails to "diafero arcor de" (after adding the at and the dot) over PMs.

"Many people's horizon is a circle with a radius of zero. They call it their point of view."

Deep Island Shard | Offline KI
diafero
Deep Island Admin
 
Posts: 2972
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Germany

Re: IC site

Postby Trylon » Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:50 pm

Because I see a fundamental difference between OOC information and IC information.

But same as you don't get my point, I don't get your point, so how about we just agree to disagree, ok ;)
It's not worth having a fight over anyway. 8-)
One day I ran through the cleft for the fiftieth time, and found that uru held no peace for me anymore.
User avatar
Trylon
 
Posts: 1446
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:08 pm
Location: Gone from Uru

Re: IC site

Postby diafero » Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:15 pm

So true, that's definitely not worth it. After all, I won't have the additional work, you will have it :D . Just don't expect any mercy when you are unable to follow the stream of age updates :lol:
I prefer e-mails to "diafero arcor de" (after adding the at and the dot) over PMs.

"Many people's horizon is a circle with a radius of zero. They call it their point of view."

Deep Island Shard | Offline KI
diafero
Deep Island Admin
 
Posts: 2972
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Germany

Re: IC site

Postby BAD » Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:23 pm

Fero,

It's not about following age updates, it's about creating a narrative for ages that either the authors of the ages or the groups who are RPing at the GOW site feel should have a description and notes on the site. No one is trying to compete with the Alcugs list. This is a strictly for IC sub plots, not in anyway going to interfere or replace a repository for all of the ages released, as the Alcugs page is.

It's not about keeping an updated list, it's about facilitating peoples IC stories. I have to agree that the Alcugs list has OOC qualities that may not be well suited for certain peoples stories.
BAD is as good as he gets
User avatar
BAD
 
Posts: 832
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:44 am

Re: IC site

Postby JWPlatt » Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:19 am

Tweek wrote:As I mentioned in the thread which then got split off. Wordpress has a Multi-user mechanism called WordPress MU. Allows for a single installation of Wordpress with multiple blogs for users.

http://mu.wordpress.org/

WordPress 3.0 (now in beta) finally merges WordPress and WordPress MU. OpenURU.org has been using WordPress MU and this news is welcome. Also, besides going fancy with something like LDAP, there are other products which can integrate various web app authentication and user accounts.
OpenUru.org: An Uru project resource site.
Perfect speed is being there.
User avatar
JWPlatt
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:13 pm
Location: Everywhere, all at once

Re: IC site

Postby Aloys » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:22 pm

I have made a first draft of the pages that need the most text. Here it is.
This is still a draft, so comments and critiques are welcome. -– I think the 'About' section is a bit long.

The Home page
Home Page Show Spoiler


'About' page
'About' Show Spoiler


Age creation FAQ
FAQ Show Spoiler


'Contact' page
Contact Show Spoiler
User avatar
Aloys
 
Posts: 1968
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: France (GMT +1)

Re: IC site

Postby Aloys » Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:45 am

Following some of the latest comments about guilds on the MOUL forums I've made this small update to the 'About' Page:
Who is the GoW?
The Guild is totally open: anyone is free to join at any time. There is no hierarchy, no structure of any kind, no 'rules', and there isn't really a fixed team – although we do have many veteran people who have been here ever since the Cavern first opened. At any time the Guild is composed of several dozens of Explorers, with a core group of old-timers and highly contributing people.
In fact the Guild of Writers is not really a guild. The GoW is an open space, not an ivory tower; people come and go and anyone is welcome to participate. There is enough work for all good wills and people from all horizons are welcome. Some people participate more than others,
There is no real membership status, if you want to 'join' the GoW come to our forums see what's going on, and if you like it just stick around. :)

To me this paragraph is one of the most important part (and the most difficult one to get right) of the IC site. Although we could (should?) totally copy/paste it word for word on the OOC site.
User avatar
Aloys
 
Posts: 1968
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: France (GMT +1)

Re: IC site

Postby diafero » Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:29 pm

I like that description :)
I prefer e-mails to "diafero arcor de" (after adding the at and the dot) over PMs.

"Many people's horizon is a circle with a radius of zero. They call it their point of view."

Deep Island Shard | Offline KI
diafero
Deep Island Admin
 
Posts: 2972
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Germany

PreviousNext

Return to RP Planning

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron