Grogyan wrote:So still going with, what it seems to me as, an arbitrary release number.
It great to have a new downloadable version
Any particular reason why you guys aren't using the SVN number as the postfix to the zip file?
Makes it hard to know otherwise how old it is from whats is in SVN
The version number scheme that I have been trying to use is quite easy to understand. Although, I do imagine that there are some discrepancies in releases that haven't been by me.
MAJOR . MINOR .BUGFIX
Major = Major Number, changed when massive changes to code are made.
Minor = New features added
Bugfix = Bugs are fixed. NO NEW FEATURES EVER!!!!!
I always prefer to release an "RC" before the final version (this release was an RC).
As to the SVN, if you're not interesting ino reading the SVN logs and figuring it out for yourself (which isn't hard at all... I use log messages and tag releases), then I am most certainly not interested in helping you; however, if you HAVE read the SVN log and still can't figure it out, then you have a legitimate to ask. Also, if you took time to learn a bit about SVN, then you would know that release tags are RARELY committed to, and are safe to use.
And thus ends this moment's rant. Please stay turned for more ranting. <Rainbow TV Screen: Beeeeeeeeeeeeeep>