JWPlatt wrote:Just to add to my previous note, I consider using the OpenURU.org bug tracker appropriate because it satisfies the conditions of Chogon's clarifications. For project websites on OpenURU.org subdomains: if it's okay on the MOUL forums, it's okay on OpenURU.org.
Whilyam wrote:JWPlatt wrote:Just to add to my previous note, I consider using the OpenURU.org bug tracker appropriate because it satisfies the conditions of Chogon's clarifications. For project websites on OpenURU.org subdomains: if it's okay on the MOUL forums, it's okay on OpenURU.org.
zib_redlektab wrote:I think the sites should be offered for free, and then add extra perks for those who pay (a premium service). Perhaps a basic site would be just a wordpress blog, and then premium would allow ftp access and a gallery? Something like that. I think people would be a lot more likely to join up if they can get a free taste beforehand.
JWPlatt wrote:OpenURU.org is not limiting its projects in that way. OpenURU.org will move according to the needs and projects of the community, not to my idea of what those projects should be. In other words, projects will move OpenURU.org, not the other way around. I would like variety/diversity for cross-pollination. If age creators find OpenURU.org attractive, they'll make that home base for a project. Same with GoW. OpenURU.org is hosting one Uru age expansion pack project right now. Finally, I see no need to develop tools which already exist just because they "weren't invented here." If new tools are created, it'll be for the independent need of a project, but not because I have any influence over it.
I expect all the "gray area" tools to open up once open source Uru is released.
Thanks,
JW
Tsar Hoikas wrote:If JWPlatt wishes to take part in this conversation, then he should become a representative. Please do not repost his blatant advertisements for OpenUru.org
Return to Representative Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests