Page 2 of 2
Re: Fan made ages? I think not!
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:40 pm
by andylegate
Re: Fan made ages? I think not!
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:42 pm
by Tsar Hoikas
I have always been impartial to User-Generated Content and User-Generated Ages
UGC and UGA (my favorite college football mascot
... Take 'em woof! woof! woof! woof!)
Re: Fan made ages? I think not!
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 8:41 pm
by belford
I'm an Uru fan. Everything I've done in the Myst universe is fan work.
If you think "fan-made" is a negative term, I'll cope.
Re: Fan made ages? I think not!
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 9:01 pm
by ghaelen
lol@andylegate
I like Fan-Generated Ages, too. FGA's
Re: Fan made ages? I think not!
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:50 am
by Zander
Okay, let's look at this. Neither "fan" nor "user" work IC, whatever their connotations. Ideally we want a term which will work both IC and OOC. Explorer Written Ages and Newly Written Ages are...okay, but a bit meh, as they say these days. I'd happily go with "Created," both IC and OOC, but I know some people would object.
How about New Generation Ages? (NGA)
Post-D'ni Ages? (PDA)
Ages of Humanity? (AoH)
Re: Fan made ages? I think not!
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:37 am
by Zander
Oh dear. Come back...I didn't mean to do whatever it was I did...
Re: Fan made ages? I think not!
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:05 pm
by Nek'rahm
How bout ELA? Explorer Linked Ages. It says the Ages have a stable link to each side, so that would imply the Ages are on ULM >_>
