Page 16 of 34

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:19 pm
by ddb174
Jojon wrote:(..and guys). :)

Indeed, Wolle did that work ;) And my thanks to Perle for making this addition to Rell-too!

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:52 pm
by Jojon
If you have been wondering what the clanking noises that have been echoing from the general direction of Rell-Too lately, that would be Robert the civil engineer, who has been constructing a new airvent in the lower cave of tower one, replacing the old broken one with a technological marvel to put Isambard Kingdom Brunel to shame. Thanks to Robert's hard work, reconditioning conditional recreations, it is now possible to call the lift down from the top, should one find onself without a ride and perhaps to deny others the pleasure..(?)

Thank you very much for another fine contribution, Robert!

First post, links, updated.

Next up is Justintime9, then Ametist.


NOTE: This update also includes a newer revision of Corvus' handwriting font, which is also used in other ages she is involved with. Should you ever go back to an older version of any of these ages, you may find yourself with slightly mismatched dingbats in her journals - a reinstall of the latest release of any of the ages should restore your sanity.

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:49 pm
by teedyo
Hmmm... If That shutter is operational; I might have to swipe, err, borrow it for my age that may never be complete so I don't have to build one from scratch. Mine would be unrelated to air, but misdirection, however.

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:13 pm
by Corvus
Great job, Robert! Of course I had to jump down to walk around on the new air vent system and was happy I could walk out again easily. :)

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:23 pm
by Justintime9
Awesome Job! As far as it being my turn, I don't really have much time to add much, but I have a few ideas. Hopefully I can find some time to work one it. :D

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:40 pm
by Rize
I was wondering if you were still accepting people to work on this. I have been following it for a while and find it interesting; the ideas that could come from it are astounding.

Thanks in advance,
Rize

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:38 am
by Jojon
You are now on the team, Rize - thanks for joining!
If I was too hasty adding you, causing a case of cold feet, just let me know and I'll remove you again. :)


@Everybody: In accordance with current policy, new members are added at the tail of the list. Maybe, seeing as we are a good manageable number and there not exactly being an avalanche of fresh "applicants" anyway, it might be safe to add them right after the current participant instead, while they're "on a roll", so to speak? (I figure, if you jump headlong into something and then have to wait your turn for a few weeks, you'll lose momentum, kind of like stalling your engine at a traffic light turning green. :P)
Some of you have been in this position. Please share your thoughts, everybody.


Another policy matter: Whenever somebody has been unable to have their go, at the particular time they're up, I have simply let them slide down (permanently) one position in the list, so that they get a second chance after the next contributor is done. Does this sound good to one and all?

EDIT: Tiny clarification made, regarding the last question)

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:39 am
by Justintime9
Another policy matter: Whenever somebody has been unable to have their go, at the particular time they're up, I have simply let them slide down (permanently) one position in the list, so that they get a second chance after the next contributor is done. Does this sound good to one and all?


Ya, you could probably do that for me, I don't want to hold you guys up because of a lack of time.

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:54 am
by Robert The Rebuilder
Fine by me.

Thanks for making this so successful, Jojon!

Re: Chain letter age

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:10 am
by Jojon
Justintime9 wrote:
Another policy matter: Whenever somebody has been unable to have their go, at the particular time they're up, I have simply let them slide down (permanently) one position in the list, so that they get a second chance after the next contributor is done. Does this sound good to one and all?


Ya, you could probably do that for me, I don't want to hold you guys up because of a lack of time.


It is done!

See you again in a week or two. :)

(For anyone who expects to be unavailable for some time: you could specify how many places you want to be moved down, if you wish.)