Recreating the Carboniferous Swamp Forest

User avatar
Whilyam
Posts: 1023
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:55 pm
MOULa KI#: 22798
Contact:

Re: Recreating the Carboniferous Swamp Forest

Post by Whilyam »

The export is so large because you have far too many vertices/faces. Probably the trees. If you took the default cylinder-creator, each trunk section/branch has 32 faces. Multiply that by the number of sections the tree has (likely 10+). Multiply that by the number of trees. Perhaps you can use this as an example of the limitations of modeling this.
User avatar
Chacal
Posts: 2515
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:45 pm
MOULa KI#: 0
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: Recreating the Carboniferous Swamp Forest

Post by Chacal »

Jennifer_P wrote:And it's even longer when your project is due in a few hours. (It's late now anyway though; gmail is being incooperative)


NOOOOOOOOOO!!!! Our project is late!
Chacal


"The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the strong."
-- Mahatma Gandhi
Jennifer_P
Posts: 729
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:54 pm

Re: Recreating the Carboniferous Swamp Forest

Post by Jennifer_P »

The export is so large because you have far too many vertices/faces. Probably the trees. If you took the default cylinder-creator, each trunk section/branch has 32 faces. Multiply that by the number of sections the tree has (likely 10+). Multiply that by the number of trees. Perhaps you can use this as an example of the limitations of modeling this.

Yeah, definitely too many vertices. For the lepidodendrons, I think one type of them had like 5,000 vertices because I used the subdivide tool too much! Yikes, huh? And I did mention that 5,000 vertex lepidodendron in my report too. Unfortunately I forgot to add in Trylon's PyPRP 101 information, a fact which I noticed several hours after mailing my report in.

And sorry Chacal...I'm afraid that I don't plan to give you guys any coauthor credit (unless I get a bad grade). :P
Locked

Return to “Jennifer's Journal”