greendragoon wrote:I agree, especially in this earlier stage where much of what the GoW is doing is still in the pipeline.
What I was thinking wouldn't be tied to ULM. So this wouldn't deal with prefix numbers or any of the technical aspects of an age. The purpose of this database, would be to present currently released and soon-to-be-released ages in a layman's format. I think screenshots are a must. Descriptions, status and news on each age.
Trylon wrote:Well, not neccesarily planned features, but very easy to implement as such when things get working.
Justintime9 wrote:you're making a new version of ULM?!then perhaps you could just add these features to that!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests